Learning how to learn (and teach): The application of neuroscience of education



Technique

Explanation

Utility

Effectiveness

Elaborative interrogation

Asking “why” rather than “what”

Moderate


Self-explanation

Learners explain the process they used

Moderate


Summarisation


Low

Good for learners who need to generate information and not multiple-choice questions exam type.

Highlighting

Learners highlights text

Low

Ineffective, especially when overdone.

Keyword mnemonic

Learner associates concept to words and imagery

Low

Good for short term memory only.

Imagery of text learning

Learners creates mental images while reading

Low

Ineffective while reading, more effective while listening.

Re-reading

Reading again the same text

Low

More effective over a long period of time only.

Practice testing

Learners is tested on what should have been learned.

High

Very effective for recall. Very effective when learners creates the questions. Cornell University note-taking system is effective.

http://lsc.cornell.edu/wp-content/uploads/2015/10/Cornell-Note_Taking-System.pdf

Distributed practice

The spacing of the learning in a timeframe

High

Best spacing is 10-20% of the time, i.e. if a learner wants to remember something for a year the studying should be done every month or so.

Interleaved practice

Learner jumps from one topic to another that is not directly connected in a haphazard fashion

Moderate

Effective for motor learning (using the environment) and cognitive learning (math).

Based on Dunlosky, J., Rawson, K. A., Marsh, E. J., Nathan, M. J., & Willingham, D. T. (2013). Improving students’ learning with effective learning techniques promising directions from cognitive and educational psychology.Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 14(1), 4-58.

Last modified: Tuesday, 6 September 2016, 9:30 AM